Tax officials need a good reason to start an on-site audit. What are the rules for auditing the financial tax Schedule of scheduled tax audits for the year
Tax audits in 2017 have become more dangerous. Inspectors often involve the police. Checklist: how to prepare for tax audits, in which transactions inspectors find schemes.
At present, inspectors on VAT chambers primarily monitor three-stage transactions. And if they reveal discrepancies and non-payment of tax, then they begin an in-depth audit. We have new details. An inspector who participates in such checks, on condition of anonymity, told how illegal deductions are promoted in practice. The main trick is to swoop in with the police.
What transactions are monitored by tax authorities during audits in 2017
The inspectors track the chains of "one-day - transit - buyer" every quarter. Their essence is as follows. The buyer-beneficiary is a company that is trying to get an illegal VAT deduction. The transiter is the supplier of the beneficiary. It reflects significant turnover in the declaration, but the amount of tax is minimal due to the high proportion of deductions. The transiter is put in a chain so that the direct counterparty of the company is not a one-day supplier. She does not report on VAT or submits a zero declaration.
Because of this, the tax inspection program gives discrepancies. Inspectors ask for clarifications, one-day suppliers submit clarifications with VAT payable in the amount that the buyer set for deduction. But in fact, nothing is listed. Companies think that this is all over, because there are no more discrepancies. And the inspectors begin a thorough check (detailed in the diagram below). They also find other inconsistencies in the counterparties' documents, which additionally confirm the illegality of the deductions (see table).
Important figures on field tax audits in 2017
When criminal cases are initiated
Many people think that inspectors come with the police only when there are enough violations to initiate a criminal case for tax evasion. That is, when the arrears exceed 5 million rubles. for three consecutive years, provided that the arrears are more than 25 percent of the total amount of taxes. Or the amount of unpaid taxes is more than 15 million rubles. (). It's a delusion.
The tax authorities will appoint an on-site inspection with the police if they see that the company has participated in one-day schemes at least twice. Therefore, the risk of a joint audit is too high if the company declared doubtful, in the opinion of the inspector, deductions in the declaration in two quarters. Especially when it comes to millions.
What can the police do
Checking with the police is dangerous for two reasons. Firstly, on such inspections, the tax authorities charge 75 percent more than on a regular audit. For nine months of 2016, the average price of a police check is 25.4 million rubles. And the usual exit - an average of 14.6 million rubles.
Secondly, the police are more efficient than the tax authorities, looking for directors and founders of one-night stands, interrogating and seizing documents, seals, flash drives with gray accounting data, etc. Often the director of the counterparty tells the tax authorities that he runs the company. And when the police take him, he denies and refuses all transactions. It happened, for example, that a nominee director admitted that a company representative promised him a reward or said that it was enough to certify a statement that he had signed invoices, and the tax authorities would no longer bother him (decree Arbitration Court Moscow District dated June 16, 2016 No. F05-7588/2016).
Additional measures of tax control (Article 101 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation)
How a scheme is recognized at tax audits
Error | How the error helped the tax authorities |
---|---|
Invoices contradict acts of acceptance and delivery of work | In the waybills for the transfer of materials to the subcontractor, the date was indicated later than the date of the act of delivery of the finished object to the customer ( decision of the Ninth Arbitration Court of Appeal dated September 26, 2016 No. 09AP-41557/2016). |
Invoices do not match company technology | Invoices indicate a large weight and volume of goods. However, neither the company nor the counterparty has the machinery and equipment for loading and unloading such goods. In addition, the weight of the transported cargo exceeds the allowable for TCP ( decision of the Arbitration Court of the North Caucasus District dated February 17, 2016 No. Ф08-551 / 2016). |
The customer's answers disagree with the documents of the general contractor | The general contractor wrote off the cost of work under subcontracts as expenses. But the customer said that he provided access to the facility only to the employees of the general contractor (). |
According to the documents, the warehouse is used by the supplier, but in fact - by another company | The tax authorities inspected the warehouse, for which the supplier had an agreement to rent. In the warehouse, the tax authorities found only cardboard boxes on which another organization is indicated as the consignee, and a printout of a letter from the manager of another third-party company ( Decree of the Arbitration Court of the Moscow District dated October 19, 2016 No. F05-15548/2016). |
Contractor's employees had to travel to the site, but there are no travel expenses | According to the documents, the contractor carried out installation work in another region, but did not purchase tickets for employees and did not pay other travel expenses ( decision of the Arbitration Court of Moscow dated May 25, 2016 No. A40-216329 / 15-108-1761). |
There is one contract different options | The tax authorities had two options for one contract with a counterparty: one was signed by the director, the other by his deputy (). |
The police also have special methods - they can listen to phones. If a criminal case is opened, then a search is possible. During a search, the investigator has the right to prohibit employees from communicating and moving around the office.
Policemen also often participate in court by proxy from the inspection, if the company disputes additional charges. Tax officials say the involvement of the police strengthens their position and helps them win disputes. At the same time, the judges of the Supreme Arbitration Court allowed the tax authorities to use the materials obtained by the police (paragraph 45 of the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation dated July 30, 2013 No. 57). Therefore, judges accept as evidence polls of directors, founders, which were conducted by the police (decision of the Moscow Arbitration Court of June 20, 2016 No. A40-49897 / 16-115-424).
How tax authorities check participants in the scheme
How much, on average, inspectors charge extra for on-site inspections with the police (data for nine months of 2016)
Choose your subject of the Russian Federation |
Average cost of an on-site tax audit with the police (rubles) |
Moscow |
|
Belgorod region |
|
Bryansk region |
|
Vladimir region |
|
Voronezh region |
|
Ivanovo region |
|
Kaluga region |
|
Kostroma region |
|
Kursk region |
|
Lipetsk region |
|
Moscow region |
|
Oryol Region |
|
Ryazan Oblast |
|
Smolensk region |
|
Tambov Region |
|
Tver region |
|
Tula region |
|
Yaroslavl region |
|
Saint Petersburg |
|
Republic of Karelia |
|
Komi Republic |
|
Arkhangelsk Region and Nenets Autonomous District |
|
Vologda Region |
|
Kaliningrad region |
|
Leningrad region |
|
Murmansk region |
|
Novgorod region |
|
Pskov region |
|
The Republic of Dagestan |
|
The Republic of Ingushetia |
|
Kabardino-Balkarian Republic |
|
Karachay-Cherkess Republic |
|
Republic of North Ossetia-Alania |
|
Chechen Republic |
|
Stavropol region |
|
Republic of Adygea |
|
Republic of Kalmykia |
|
Republic of Crimea |
- (there were no checks with the police) |
Astrakhan region |
|
Volgograd region |
|
Rostov region |
|
Sevastopol |
|
Republic of Bashkortostan |
|
Mari El Republic |
|
The Republic of Mordovia |
|
Republic of Tatarstan |
|
Udmurt republic |
|
Kirov region |
|
Nizhny Novgorod Region |
|
Orenburg region |
|
Penza region |
|
Perm region |
|
Samara Region |
|
Saratov region |
|
Ulyanovsk region |
|
Kurgan region |
|
Sverdlovsk region |
|
Tyumen region |
|
Chelyabinsk region |
|
Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug-Yugra |
|
Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug |
|
Altai Republic |
|
The Republic of Buryatia |
|
Tyva Republic |
|
The Republic of Khakassia |
|
Irkutsk region |
|
Kemerovo region |
|
Novosibirsk region |
|
Tomsk region |
|
The Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) |
|
Primorsky Krai |
|
Khabarovsk region |
|
Amur region |
|
Kamchatka Krai |
|
Magadan Region |
|
Sakhalin region |
|
Jewish Autonomous Region |
|
Chukotka Autonomous Okrug |
Is it possible to avoid field tax audits
You can get acquainted with it on the official website of the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation (http://plan.genproc.gov.ru/plan2017/). To find out if checks are planned for a particular company or individual entrepreneur, you need to enter the following data in the search form (you can limit yourself to one or more items):
- name of the organization or full name of the individual entrepreneur;
- month of verification;
- body name state control or supervision;
- the address of the checked object.
If a business entity really needs an audit, the search results will include, among other things, its duration in working days or hours, as well as the subject of the audit (for example, ensuring consumer rights, sanitary and epidemiological supervision, fire supervision, industrial safety supervision, compliance with license requirements, etc.).
What should be taken into account when preparing a response to a request from a supervisory authority during an audit? How to assess compliance with the law of the actions of inspectors? Users of the GARANT system can receive prompt assistance from experts by phone by connecting New Product "Expert advice. Checks, taxes, law" .
Recall that the General Prosecutor's Office of the Russian Federation publishes a consolidated plan for inspections of economic entities annually based on data provided by regulatory authorities (, federal law dated December 26, 2008 No. 294-FZ "On the protection of the rights of legal entities and individual entrepreneurs in the exercise of state control (supervision) and municipal control"; hereinafter - Law No. 294-FZ). However, tax audits are not included in the plan.
Starting from January 1, 2017, another form of checks appeared - a test purchase. But such purchases will be carried out without prior notice to the company or individual entrepreneur and on the grounds provided for unscheduled inspections (). Therefore, there is no information about them in the summary plan of inspections.
Small businesses continue to enjoy supervisory holidays, which will last until December 31, 2018. This means that scheduled inspections are not carried out in respect of them if they have not committed gross violations over the past three years. If, however, a representative of a small business nevertheless finds a record of an upcoming inspection on the website of the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation, he can.
One-day companies and mutually dependent companies will be a priority for tax audits in 2017. Changes, new rules for desk and field audits and debt collection will be discussed in the article.
New rules on tax audits 2017: what are the reasons for the changes
The Federal Tax Service of Russia published on nalog.ru "Tax Passport" of each region and statistics on the arrears of companies in the whole country. Debts have risen like never before last years. Because of this, the tax authorities have been tasked with reducing the amount of companies' debt as soon as possible. They will attack from all sides.
Let's see what the 2017 tax audits will be like, what changes, new rules you should prepare for.
Desk and field tax audits in 2017
Tax audits in 2017 will be more dangerous - inspectors are trying to charge more and more not only on field audits, but also on cameral ones. During all checks, special attention will be paid to one-day transactions. This is reported by the tax authorities we interviewed. The company will be asked for clarifications or documents on such transactions. And some inspections immediately demand to remove expenses and deductions if the counterparty is listed in the one-day database. There are still new trends in the next checks.
Frequent cameras. Inspectors conduct in-depth camera meetings now 20 percent more often than a year ago. This means that the likelihood that you will be asked for clarifications or documents for an in-depth audit and larger additional charges than before is also growing. Thus, over the year, the average price of one effective camera camera has sharply increased - up to 58 thousand rubles. This is 39 percent more than last year (41,700 rubles). Tax officials report that accruals have increased due to VAT cameras - the FTS program now automatically detects discrepancies between the supplier and the buyer. At the same time, the share of effective cameras still stands still - 5 percent.
Expensive field checks. Every year, inspectors come to companies less and less often - in the first nine months of 2016, the tax authorities checked 17,362 organizations, and a year ago - 19,749. additional charges. The average price of an on-site inspection has increased by almost half - by 45 percent. According to the data for the nine months of 2016, it amounts to 14,605,000 rubles, and a year ago the tax authorities charged much less - 10,044,000 rubles. But prices may vary in your area. For example, in Moscow it is 41.6 million rubles, in St. Petersburg - 71.8 million rubles, and in the Krasnodar Territory - 4.9 million rubles.
All this suggests that the tax authorities plan audits even more accurately. Tax audits in 2017 will not be an exception. Changes, new rules allow you to select potential violators using the ASK VAT-2 system. In 2017, the tax authorities will plan on-site audits primarily based on the gaps that the program has identified in VAT returns.
In 2017, the tax authorities are also planning comprehensive audits of interdependent companies. That is, they want to check the entire group of such organizations at once. In this way, inspectors will be able to analyze transactions between dependent counterparties, identify business splitting, including those carried out in order to remain simplified.
But the most dangerous checks are still those that the tax authorities carry out jointly with the police. In the nine months of 2016, the tax authorities conducted 4,623 joint audits. The audit price was 25,428,000 rubles. This is 20 percent more than in 2015.
You can see the average price of an on-site and desk audit in your region in the table (below).
New Contribution Checks. The tax authorities will check contributions. But inspectors will not start with on-site inspections. First, work will be done using the same methods as for personal income tax (letter of the Federal Tax Service of Russia dated October 20, 2016 No. ЗН-18-1 / 1103). That is, the tax authorities will ask for clarifications about low wages, call for salary commissions, include in the inspection plan those companies that are suspected of understating the base for personal income tax and contributions.
Field inspections of the IFTS for 2017: plan and schedule of inspections
Unlike other departments (for example, funds), tax inspectors do not publish a plan and schedule of audits for the coming year.
You can learn about non-tax audits on the website of the Prosecutor General's Office. In a special form, you need to specify basic data about (OGRN company, TIN, name), and the service will show who, when and how often will check. The schedule for 2017 should be available soon.
Collection of tax debts in 2017
How tax debts have grown. According to the official statistics of the Federal Tax Service of Russia on all major taxes - profit, VAT, personal income tax - the budget received money on average 5 percent more than last year. The fall in payments was recorded only for the mineral extraction tax, and the amount of property taxes decreased quite slightly (by 2%). But at the same time, tax debts of companies are growing in all regions of the country. It turns out that this year the companies paid more than a year ago, but at the same time they owe the budget more than last year.
According to the website nalog.ru, from January 1 to September 1, 2016, the debt increased by 16 percent. Over the past five years, such a sharp jump has never happened. Therefore, in all regions, the tax authorities began enhanced measures to recover arrears. This will be especially felt by companies in Moscow, the Moscow Region, St. Petersburg, the Kabardino-Balkarian Republic and the Krasnodar Territory - here the largest debts.
How the IFTS will collect debts. First, the company will be called for a commission on debts. Many companies, even before the commission or immediately after it, transfer part of the debt to the budget in order to convince the tax authorities of their good faith. You can also agree with the tax authorities a schedule for the gradual payment of debts. Secondly, they will withdraw from bank accounts. Including if after the commission the tax authorities do not receive results. If there is not enough money in the account, they will collect debts at the expense of property. Thirdly, they will try to collect debts from the new company if the business was transferred to it. Or personally from the director, if the company became bankrupt as a result of large debts.
And fourthly, clarifications will be required. Previously, inspectors often asked the company to submit a clarification and reduce the amount of tax to the one that it actually paid so that there were no debts. Now the management of the service prohibits manipulation with clarifiers in this way. Therefore, such local requirements are not often possible. But for 6-personal income tax, they will ask for clarifications. This year, according to inspectors, personal income tax debts have increased due to errors in 6-personal income tax. You can remove the arrears and penalties by clarification.
Advice
See the safe tax burden by industry in your region on the website of the Federal Tax Service nalog.ru in the section "Statistics and Analytics" > "Tax Analytics" > "Tax Passports"
Fighting losses and low tax burden in 2017
Strengthening the work of unprofitable commissions is also one of the main tasks for the tax authorities at the end of this year and at the beginning of 2017. We learned about this from a letter from a regional FTS. Moreover, on commissions, inspectors will process not only unprofitable companies, but also those with tax amounts payable below the industry average for the region. If they call, they will require you to submit an update on profit for nine months and remove the loss. And in the declaration for 2016 - to reflect the amount of tax payable, close to a safe indicator of the tax burden in your region.
It is safer to go to the inspection and explain how you plan to get out of a loss-making or low-profit situation. A low load can be justified by the fact that sales have decreased, expenses have increased, etc.
If you ignore the call for a commission, there is a risk of an on-site inspection and enhanced cameras. And on checks, they will deal with the loss more carefully. This is evidenced by the statistics of the Federal Tax Service. So, according to the results of 9 months of 2016, tax authorities removed losses for 50 billion rubles on commissions. less than on inspections. And on inspections, losses were reduced by a total of 358.8 billion rubles. - this is twice as much as in the same period last year (179.4 billion rubles).
Important!
How else to deal with losses
From January 1, the rules for carrying forward losses will change. Now companies have the right to write off the loss of previous years without limiting the amount. From 2017, it will be possible to take into account a loss in the amount of no more than 50 percent of the tax base of the current period. This restriction is introduced for all losses that have arisen since 2007. For example, as of January 1, 2017, the company has an unwritten loss of 700,000 rubles. The tax base (profit) for the 1st quarter of 2017 is 500,000 rubles. Therefore, in the first quarter of 2017, a loss in the amount of 250,000 rubles can be taken into account. (500,000 rubles × 50%). The remaining 450,000 rubles. (700,000 - 250,000) the company will carry over to the next periods.
If the company received a loss at the end of the reporting period, then it is impossible to write off the losses of previous years. It will be possible to take them into account only when there is a profit. And no more than 50 percent of the tax base
How much does the IFTS charge additionally for inspections (data for 9 months of 2016)
Choose your subject of the Russian Federation | Average price of camera room (rub.) | Average cost of field inspection (rub.) |
Central Federal District | ||
Moscow | 126 200 | 41 611 200 |
Belgorod region | 13 500 | 5 034 600 |
Bryansk region | 22 800 | 4 595 900 |
Vladimir region | 40 400 | 25 264 700 |
Voronezh region | 10 800 | 3 919 200 |
Ivanovo region | 12 000 | 5 363 500 |
Kaluga region | 46 100 | 12 161 200 |
Kostroma region | 24 100 | 4 339 600 |
Kursk region | 19 800 | 36 942 800 |
Lipetsk region | 18 800 | 9 204 700 |
Moscow region | 49 700 | 9 018 200 |
Oryol Region | 15 500 | 5 450 100 |
Ryazan Oblast | 16 400 | 9 041 200 |
Smolensk region | 17 500 | 4 409 900 |
Tambov Region | 30 600 | 3 768 100 |
Tver region | 15 300 | 6 316 700 |
Tula region | 26 700 | 10 012 100 |
Yaroslavl region | 18 000 | 14 806 300 |
Northwestern Federal District | ||
Saint Petersburg | 12 800 | 71 828 700 |
Republic of Karelia | 12 300 | 3 644 700 |
Komi Republic | 19 400 | 21 656 200 |
Arkhangelsk Region and Nenets Autonomous Area | 19 400 | 20 665 100 |
Vologda Region | 29 000 | 9 561 400 |
Kaliningrad region | 64 700 | 27 580 100 |
Leningrad region | 45 400 | 17 811 200 |
Murmansk region | 21 200 | 22 383 400 |
Novgorod region | 18 700 | 5 006 300 |
Pskov region | 18 300 | 10 354 300 |
North Caucasian Federal District | ||
The Republic of Dagestan | 19 600 | 5 386 300 |
The Republic of Ingushetia | 31 800 | 5 345 200 |
Kabardino-Balkarian Republic | 4 940 300 | 40 115 900 |
Karachay-Cherkess Republic | 13 600 | 1 879 300 |
Republic of North Ossetia-Alania | 83 900 | 3 570 200 |
Chechen Republic | 7 700 | 3 068 800 |
Stavropol region | 66 800 | 11 583 400 |
Southern Federal District | ||
Republic of Adygea | 46 900 | 4 450 200 |
Republic of Kalmykia | 10 700 | 2 691 300 |
Republic of Crimea | 32 900 | 6 247 300 |
Krasnodar region | 25 200 | 4 985 600 |
Astrakhan region | 10 400 | 5 559 200 |
Volgograd region | 25 900 | 11 235 300 |
Rostov region | 46 100 | 8 940 300 |
Sevastopol | 13 100 | 9 356 800 |
Volga Federal District | ||
Republic of Bashkortostan | 31 600 | 5 224 000 |
Mari El Republic | 8 600 | 7 135 800 |
The Republic of Mordovia | 14 000 | 5 044 000 |
Republic of Tatarstan | 32 900 | 6 304 100 |
Udmurt republic | 39 600 | 6 724 500 |
Chuvash Republic | 22 900 | 6 433 100 |
Kirov region | 15 700 | 9 985 000 |
Nizhny Novgorod Region | 32 300 | 13 310 800 |
Orenburg region | 11 200 | 8 167 700 |
Penza region | 23 200 | 5 230 900 |
Perm region | 23 100 | 9 594 900 |
Samara Region | 33 900 | 5 787 800 |
Saratov region | 11 800 | 4 490 200 |
Ulyanovsk region | 11 000 | 8 698 000 |
Ural federal district | ||
Kurgan region | 13 800 | 3 426 300 |
Sverdlovsk region | 23 700 | 7 234 200 |
Tyumen region | 23 600 | 10 253 000 |
Chelyabinsk region | 12 000 | 11 825 300 |
Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug-Yugra | 18 700 | 14 251 500 |
Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug | 44 000 | 12 258 000 |
Siberian Federal District | ||
Altai Republic | 7500 | 12 371 300 |
The Republic of Buryatia | 21 000 | 8 475 400 |
Tyva Republic | 11 600 | 3 139 000 |
The Republic of Khakassia | 7100 | 4 582 100 |
Altai region | 17 600 | 4 866 900 |
Krasnoyarsk region | 7000 | 6 736 900 |
Irkutsk region | 14 100 | 10 191 100 |
Kemerovo region | 42 400 | 13 941 900 |
Novosibirsk region | 14 700 | 10 620 400 |
Omsk region | 14 400 | 6 600 500 |
Tomsk region | 11 600 | 11 628 500 |
Transbaikal region | 18 900 | 6 042 700 |
Far Eastern Federal District | ||
The Republic of Sakha (Yakutia) | 14 900 | 6 355 900 |
Primorsky Krai | 11 000 | 7 062 600 |
Khabarovsk region | 75 400 | 21 776 100 |
Amur region | 35 400 | 9 512 500 |
Kamchatka Krai | 13 100 | 10 332 800 |
Magadan Region | 12 400 | 6 690 200 |
Sakhalin region | 7100 | 84 627 500 |
Jewish Autonomous Region | 13 800 | 6 144 400 |
Chukotka Autonomous Okrug | 15 400 | 10 621 100 |
Tax audits are necessary to control the payment of mandatory tax amounts by entrepreneurs, to identify and eliminate violations. The tax service controls the correctness of calculations and the timeliness of payment.
The implementation of tax audits is simplified. Non-standard control methods are being introduced.
Changes in tax policy in 2020
In the tax policy plans for 2020, to increase tax revenues to the budget, not allowing an increase in the tax burden. There are more tools for obtaining arguments for the need for checks.
Significantly changed the administration, reporting on contributions. The rules for calculating certain taxes have also changed.
Administration of insurance claims
The tax authorities control the payment of insurance premiums to the FSS, PFR, FFOMS.
The calculation is provided monthly, no later than the 30th day of the current month (for the previous month). Payment is due the next month by the 15th.
From January 1, 2017, payers whose total income for 9 months did not exceed 90 million rubles will receive the right to use this system. If in a year it does not exceed 120, work in the simplified tax system will continue. The marginal residual value of funds under the conditions of transition to the simplified tax system should not exceed 150 million rubles.
Zero tax rate
It is used for main gas pipelines and gas production. This also includes the development of minerals, subsoil, helium production, capital construction projects. The complete list of objects is approved by the government of the Russian Federation.
In incentive pay
One-time incentive payments for sports projects are not taxed, namely, for prize-winning places in the Olympic, Deaflympics, Paralympic games to participants and their coaches (specialists involved in the preparation).
What do these changes mean for taxpayers?
Benefits for taxpayers:
- Reduction of the term for filing objections based on the results of examinations and other events. Its length has been reduced to 10 working days from the end of the disputed event.
- Eligibility of the requirement by the inspection additional information on tax incentives. In addition to supporting documents, the provision of explanations on the problems of property, transactions in the field of benefits can be initiated. This information must be provided within 5 days. All explanations on VAT are accepted only in electronic form. The paper version of declarations is unacceptable. Penalties are imposed for failure to provide an electronic version of the document.
- More frequent verification of the reliability of information from the Unified State Register of Legal Entities. Moreover, all complaints and claims (for example, from a competitor) are considered. Based on the received signals, additional checks are initiated, carried out within a month. Any suspicion of fictitiousness of the company or its legal address is suspicious. For example, several legal entities are registered at one address. For the period of verification of doubtful information, the tax control has the right to suspend the registration of the company. But in time it should last no more than a month. When confirming the presence of false information, the business reputation of the head and the entire company is damaged.
What will be checked more often in 2020
- Registration, registration. The operation of a company without registration is qualified as “illegal business” (it threatens up to 5 years in prison).
- Legality of income and full payment of taxes on it. Wages and other income of employees are taken into account. It turns out the presence of "gray" salaries, although these violations are difficult to prove. When assessing additional contributions, only specifically identified amounts are taken into account.
- Creation of "leftist" firms. With the illegal creation of a legal entity and the use of documents for this purpose, there is a risk of imprisonment for up to 5 years, and for cashing financial resources through shell companies - up to 7.
- Artificial overestimation of the cost, purchase prices. In 2020, there is an increase in tax sanctions for the use of non-market prices.
Types of checks
Inspections are represented by desk and field inspections, scheduled and unscheduled.
cameral
It is carried out in the tax authority using the data of tax returns. It is legal to check the documentation if (Article 88 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation):
- the declaration declares a tax for budget reimbursement;
- an application has been submitted by the organization for a reduction in tax, an increase in the amount of losses 2 years after the first declaration;
- found a number of inconsistencies or contradictions;
- claiming tax relief.
If violations are detected based on the results of a desk audit, an on-site inspection may be initiated.
visiting
To avoid stressful situations, it is necessary to always be ready for such meetings. Information can come from the counterparty, the tax inspector. The database is closed for public access.
Field-type inspections involve a thorough examination financial reporting with the possibility of subsequent imposition of sanctions (from a fine to arrest). It is impossible to know about the upcoming visit in advance. But for 2020, the tax authorities are required to carry out an on-site audit based on the results of a desk audit if there are shortcomings.
Stages of implementation:
- Documentation analysis. It is held on the territory of the organization (enterprise) with a preliminary announcement and presentation of an official certificate. Procedures: requesting documentation, obtaining the necessary explanations, inspecting the territories, seizing the necessary financial documents. Duration check should not be more than 2 months. Up to 4 months, the extension is eligible in the following cases: the object belongs to the largest taxpayers, force majeure.
- Summing up the results with a report. The report compiles the taxable base, analyzes the identified violations, and formulates recommendations for their correction. If necessary, additional taxes are assessed and sanctions are imposed.
What is the first thing the tax authorities want to find? If earlier the search priority was unreasonable expenses for additional accrual of profit and VAT, now the search for undeclared revenue has been added. Even complaints from employees dismissed from the organization are considered. The courts often take the side of the tax authorities.
Suspension and extension
An audit of taxpayers (field or office) may be suspended in the following cases:
- implementation of a counter check;
- collection of necessary documents;
- implementation of the examination.
An extension can be implemented for many reasons:
- if the taxpayer is one of the largest;
- according to available information from various sources about tax offenses;
- in case of force majeure emergencies (fire, flood, others);
- if the company has separate divisions;
- in case of failure to provide the requested documents on time;
- under other circumstances.
The duration of a standard on-site inspection is two months (can be increased to 4-6).
Scheduled and unscheduled tax audits
Scheduled inspections are generally carried out once every three years. The company is notified about them no later than three days in advance. But there are also unscheduled ones. They can be carried out by Rospotrebnadzor in places Catering and drug sales.
The table shows situations, which may cause the initiation of unscheduled tax control in 2020.
What is the signal to check (reasons for control) | What violations are expected |
---|---|
Reducing the tax burden in relation to the industry average level (by 10% or less) | There is a suspicion of tax savings |
Lack of active communication during the period of conclusion of the contract, violation of the rules for its execution, lack of reliable information about the location of the premises | Interaction with counterparties that cause suspicion (distrust) |
Exceeding the rate of increase in spending over income | Assumption of understatement of income, overstatement of expenses |
Continued losses | Loss inconsistency with increase in sales revenue |
Low salaries of employees (below the industry average by 10%) | Suspicion of payments "in envelopes" |
Doubtfulness of contracts with existing intermediaries | Suspicion, for example, of manipulation with a product that, in a given volume, in given time just couldn't be produced. Discrepancy of the indicated material resources with the actual data, another. |
Change of location | Special reprieve to correct identified violations |
Non-compliance with the industry average level of profitability | Underreporting |
Common measures of tax authorities to search for information and evidence are the following:
- Questioning contractors (employees under the contract), all possible witnesses.
- Punishment of witnesses for failure to appear.
- Visiting witnesses, in case of their failure to appear on call, at home with the preparation of a protocol and fixing on video.
- Using the capabilities of the district inspector in the search for witnesses, interrogating him in order to acquire information.
- Search for an informal approach, alternative sources, the use of photos, audio, video fixing facts that since May 2016 are eligible as evidence in court.
- Search for information, evidence on the Internet, in the 2-NDFL database, at the request of banks, traffic police, PRF.
- Seizure of physical evidence (hard drives, computers) in the presence of the police.
- Using call logs cellular communication and social telephone surveys.
Tips for best options behavior of the director in the event of an audit may be the following:
In 2020, enterprises will be included in the tax audit plan in the following cases:
- If the amount of violations is above 10 million rubles.
- In the presence of gross violations or complete disregard for the requirements of tax reporting.
- If the organization is included in the plan for 2020 based on the results of a desk audit.
- At zero balance, initiating the liquidation process.
- When entering the number of the largest taxpayers.
- On behalf of law enforcement agencies.
Responsibility for results
The Inspectorate has the right to apply to entrepreneurs, legal entities tax sanctions. Some documents may be transferred to the police department for initiation of a criminal case. The degree of punishment depends on the identified violations and the conditions that aggravate or mitigate them.
Removal of tax liability is expected in the following cases: upon expiration of the statute of limitations, innocence of an offense related to taxes. Exclude the guilt of natural disasters, force majeure, the execution of instructions in writing from the regulatory agencies.
The list of mitigating and aggravating conditions is reflected in article 112 of the Tax Code of the Russian Federation. Tax liability does not guarantee exemption from criminal or administrative liability.
Publication date: 27.01.2017 04:54 (archived)
The legislator notes that if the above explanations are submitted on paper, such explanations will not be considered submitted.
As before, the preparation and sending of the document is given 5 days from the date of receipt of the request for clarification. Other documents may be attached to the explanation confirming the accuracy of the data entered in the tax reporting, but all of them must also be in electronic format.
Secondly, there appeared the new kind liability for tax violations.
For non-submission (late submission) by a person to the tax authority of the explanations specified in paragraph 3 of the article in the event of failure to submit the revised tax return within the prescribed period from January 1, 2017, the liability provided for by paragraph 1 of Article 129.1 of the Code (paragraph 13 of Article 1 of Federal Law N 130- FZ).
Recall that paragraph 3 of Article 88 of the Code provides for three grounds for sending a request for explanations: if errors are found in the declaration (calculation) and (or) contradictions between the information contained in the submitted documents, or inconsistencies between the information provided by the taxpayer and the information contained in documents held by the tax authority and received by it in the course of tax control; in the case when a loss is declared in the declaration or when a "clarification" is submitted, in which the amount of tax payable to the budget is reduced.
Thus, liability arises for non-submission (late submission) of explanations, as well as in the case of submission of VAT explanations on paper, in the form of a fine of 5,000 rubles, and the same acts committed repeatedly during a calendar year, the fine will already be 20 000 rub.
In addition, paragraph 6 of Article 88 of the Code was amended to allow the tax authority, when conducting a desk tax audit, to require the taxpayer-organization or the taxpayer-individual entrepreneur to provide the necessary explanations about transactions (property) for which tax benefits have been applied within five days .