Work program on the subject as a tool. The structure of the work program for FGOS. Work program structure

"Drawing up workers

programs in accordance with FSES

and approved changes. "

15.04.2016 1. "On the working programs of academic subjects" letter from the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated 28.10.2015. No. 08-1786 2. Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia No. 1576 of December 31, 2015 “On Amendments to the Federal State Educational Standard of the NOO, approved by the order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation of October 6, 2009. No. 373 "3. Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia No. 1577 dated December 31, 2015" On Amendments to FGOS LLC, approved by order of the RF Ministry of Education and Science of December 17, 2010. No. 1897 " "On the working programs of academic subjects" letter from the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated 28.10.2015. No. 08-1786 1. "... In order to reduce the administrative burden of teaching staff of PA, the Department has prepared amendments to the Federal State Educational Standard in terms of requirements for work programs of academic subjects." 2. “... the author's curricula of academic subjects, developed in accordance with the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard and taking into account the approximate educational program of the corresponding level of education, can also be considered as work programs of educational subjects. The decision on the possibility of their use in the OOP structure is made at the OO level "

3. “… amendments to the Procedure for the formation of the federal list of textbooks have been prepared,… It is assumed that textbooks with a methodological manual for teachers containing materials on teaching methods, studying a subject or education will be included in the FPU; incl. an approximate work program of the academic subject, developed in accordance with the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard ... "

Mandatory elements of the work program of a separate academic subject, course Before 12/31/2015 From 01/01/2016 1) Explanatory note 2) General characteristics of the academic subject, course 3) Description of the place of the subject, course in the curriculum 4) Personal, meta-subject and subject results of mastering the academic subject , course 5) Content of the subject, course 6) Thematic planning with the definition of the main types of educational activities 7) Description of educational - methodical and material - technical support 8) Planned results of studying a separate subject, course 1) Planned results of mastering the subject, course 2) Content of the subject, course 3) Thematic planning indicating the number of hours devoted to mastering each topic Mandatory elements of the work program of extracurricular activities Until 31.12.2015 (FGOS NOE) From 01.01.2016 (FGOS NOO and FGOS LLC) 1) Explanatory note 2 ) General characteristics of the subject, course 3) Description place of the subject, course in the curriculum 4) Personal, meta-subject and subject results of mastering the subject, course 5) Content of the subject, course 6) Thematic planning with the definition of the main types of educational activities 7) Description of educational - methodological and material - technical support 8) Planned results of studying a separate subject, course 1) Results of mastering the course of extracurricular activities. 2) The content of the course of extracurricular activities, indicating the forms of organization and types of activities; 3) Thematic planning. How are the various components related? Development of a work program, thematic planning, scheduling and thematic planning Preparation for a lesson (flow chart of a lesson target settings \u003d planned results) Design (construction) of control and measuring materials (CMM), preparation for various assessment procedures

Work programs for academic subjects (courses) are drawn up for the entire level of study

(Grades 1 - 4, grades 5 - 9), not for the academic year

Each teacher draws up his own work program, taking into account his own specifics and the specifics of specific students.

Programs written by different teachers for parallel classes may (and should) differ!

I. Planned results of studying the academic subject, course

The graduate will learn

The graduate will have the opportunity to learn

The planned results of the study of the subject, the course completely repeat the subject part of the section "Planned results of the development of OOP LLC."

However, since the Work Program is often used as a stand-alone document, it is best to repeat this section here as well.

The basis for writing this section of the Work Program is the corresponding section in the "Approximate OOP LLC", where the planned results are described by subject.

Here the column "The graduate will learn" is not changed by the teacher, while in the column "The graduate will get the opportunity to learn" there may be significant changes.

This section is based on the content “ Fundamental core»Standard

learning programs

FGOS NOO and FGOS LLC

The program does not in any way reflect the sequence of mastering the topics of the course

This section of the Work Program describes ONLY the semantic units of the curriculum by class!

III. Thematic planning with an indication of the number of hours devoted to mastering each topic

Approximate lesson thematic planning

Similar thematic planning is created FOR ALL SUBJECTS as part of the LESSON ACTIVITIES.

Calendar and thematic planning

Each teacher makes his own KTP taking into account his own specifics and the specifics of specific students.

KTP structure (in accordance with Federal State Educational Standard)

Topic of section

Lesson topic

PR (planned result from the "Graduate will learn" section) \u003d content element code

Homework

Calendar and thematic planning

It is intended for chronological ordering of content units that were described in the previous section.

Calendar and thematic planning (CTP) is made by the teacher ONLY FOR YOURSELF! THIS IS A TEACHER'S WORKING TOOL!

Therefore, the KTP should contain those columns that the teacher needs for his work.

Therefore, different teachers may have different planning forms (in the Regulations, indicate the required columns)

Thus, in the school Regulations on the work program of the teacher implementing the FGOS NOO and FGOS LLC, the teacher has the following:

• Author's program in the subject (course).
• Author's work program for the subject (course).
• Own scheduling - thematic planning containing CMMs or a link to them.

The work program is a tool with which the teacher determines the content, forms, methods and techniques of organizing educational relations that are optimal and most effective for a given class in accordance with the results determined by the FSES. The work program is a tool with which the teacher determines the content, forms, methods and techniques of organizing educational relations that are optimal and most effective for a given class in accordance with the results determined by the FSES. The RP of the subject can be the same for all teachers working in the school or individual. It is the basis for the creation of KTP.

The Russian Ministry of Education and Science issued an important order to amend the standards of basic general education. The last point of the order will be especially interesting for teachers - it greatly simplifies the structure of work programs. Whether we write less papers in reality, life will show.

However, judging by the changes made to the standard, drawing up a work program for each teacher should now take less time.

What was before the order?

The work program, in accordance with article 18 of the standard, had to include 8 points:

1. an explanatory note, which specifies the general goals of basic general education, taking into account the specifics of the academic subject;
2. general characteristics of the subject, course;
3. description of the place of the subject, course in the curriculum;
4. personal, meta-subject and subject results of mastering a specific academic subject, course;
5. thematic planning with the definition of the main types of educational activities;
6. description of educational, methodological and material and technical support of the educational process;
7. planned results of studying a subject, course.

What has become now?

Now the work programs should contain only 3 points:

1. planned results of mastering a subject, course;
2. content of the subject, course;
3. thematic planning with an indication of the number of hours allocated for the development of each topic.

That is, you do not need to write an explanatory note and a general description of the subject, give a description of its place in the general curriculum. It's no secret that all this redundant information was mechanically copied from one program and pasted into another. If a teacher has several classes, then he wrote the same thing several times in the programs, only increasing their volume.

The section describing the results of mastering the subject is also shortened: judging by the logic of the proposed changes, the description of personal and metasubject results goes to the school level, to the general educational program, and only subject results remain in workers.

The description of the main types of educational activities that is completely unnecessary in practice has been removed from thematic planning. It is now possible to do without listing the educational and methodological and material and technical support.

The proposed three-part structure seems logical: I define what I want to achieve, then I describe what material I will use to do it - and in the final I give an approximate breakdown by topics and hours (not by dates and lessons, as many reviewers require!). I would like the same structure to extend to the high school standard.

Now it is important that a variety of interpreters do not stand between the standard and the teacher, who will demand to add too much to the work programs (the issue with the form of the KTP, which is not regulated by the standard, will be especially acute). All participants in the educational process should be guided in this matter directly by the requirements of the standard, which has been changed, as we see, in the direction of relieving the teacher from paperwork. And it is by relying on the standard that the teacher must prove his innocence and the right to such relief.

Sergei Volkov

Development Statementcurriculum

Basic documents,

• state educational standard (federal and national-regional component);
• basic curriculum of schools in the Russian Federation (distribution of educational content by educational areas, academic disciplines, years and weeks);
• standard (sample) training programs;
• educational program and curriculum of the educational institution;
• work program on the subject of a particular teacher.

Sample programs in the subject

• reflect the leading worldview ideas of the development of society,
• determine the main directions for the implementation of the content of education and the requirements for the organization of the educational process, for basic knowledge, skills and abilities, taking into account the specifics of a specific academic subject;
• are designed for the number of hours allocated for the study of each educational area in the invariant part of the Basic Curriculum of the Educational Institution of the Russian Federation, approved by order of the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation No. 1312 dated 09.03.2004;
• serve as the basis for the preparation of working programs for training courses and disciplines.

An exemplary (typical) curriculum is a document that discloses in detail the mandatory (federal) components of the content of education and the parameters of the quality of assimilation of educational material in a specific subject of the basic curriculum. Recommended by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation and is advisory in nature

Sample program functions

Information and methodological function

(gives an idea of \u200b\u200bthe goals, content, general strategy of teaching, upbringing and development of students by means of a given academic subject).

Organizational and planning function

(highlights the stages of learning, structuring the educational material, determining its quantitative and qualitative characteristics at each of the stages, including for the content filling of the intermediate certification of students)

a document created on the basis of the state educational standard and the Model Program and having the author's concept of constructing the content of a training course, subject, discipline (module). The author's program is developed by one or a group of authors

The work program of the subject

this is a set of educational and methodological documentation, which is independently developed by the teacher (teachers) of the educational institution based on working curriculumand sample programs training courses, subjects, disciplines (modules) recommended by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, copyright programs from taking into account the goals and objectives of the main educational program of the school leveland which reflects ways of implementation content of the subject in a specific educational institution.

The difference between the exemplary and working program

Sample program defines basicknowledge, abilities, skills and reflects the system of leading ideological ideas, general recommendations methodological nature.

Working programm specifies the appropriate educational standard, taking into account the necessary requirements for its construction, and also describes the national-regional level, takes into account the possibilities of methodological, informational, technical support of the educational process, the level of training of students, reflects the specifics of training in this educational institution

The compiler of the working curriculum can independently

• expand the list of didactic units within the limits regulated by the maximum classroom load of students, and subject to continuity with the mandatory minima of adjacent levels of education;
• to disclose the content of sections, topics indicated in the state educational standard, relying on teaching aids (from the federal list) that he considers appropriate;
• to concretize and detail didactic units;
• establish the sequence of studying the educational material;
• distribute the time allotted for the study of the course between sections and topics according to their importance;
• supplement the list of practical lessons;
• specify the requirements for the knowledge and skills of students;
• include the material of the regional component in the amount of teaching hours allocated for this subject;
• choose on the basis of the tasks facing the academic subject, teaching technology and monitoring the preparedness of students in the subject.

Aspects reflected and taken into account in the work program

• requirements of the federal components of state educational standards;
• compulsory minimum content of educational programs;
• the maximum amount of educational material for students;
• requirements for the level of training of graduates;
• the amount of hours of study load determined by the curriculum of the educational institution for the implementation of academic subjects, modules, special courses, workshops, research and project activities in each class;
• cognitive interests of students;
• goals and objectives of the educational program of the school;
• selection of the necessary set of educational and methodological support by the teacher.

Teacher curriculum structure

• title page;
• explanatory note;
• content of the curriculum;
• educational-thematic plan & nbspthematic planning with the definition of the main types of educational activities of students);
• requirements for the level of training of students (personal, metasubject (competence) and subject results of mastering a specific academic subject, course);
• educational and methodological teaching aids (description of the material and technical, educational and methodological and informational support of the educational process

Title page of the program

• full name of the founder and educational institution in accordance with the charter;

• where, when and by whom the working curriculum was approved;
• the name of the subject (course);
• indication of the belonging of the working curriculum to the stage, level of general education;
• the period of implementation of this program;
• an indication of the sample program and its authors, on the basis of which this working curriculum was developed;
• full name. the teacher who wrote this work curriculum

• title, author and year of publication of a specific program (approximate, author's), on the basis of which the Working Program was developed;
• goals and objectives of this program training in the formation of a system of knowledge, skills (tasks are formulated in accordance with the standard and taking into account the given educational institution);
• logical connections this subject with the rest of the curriculum;
• content selection justification and the general logic of the sequence of its study, the distinctive features of the work program in comparison with the approximate program (change in the number of hours for the study of certain topics, structural rearrangement of the order of studying topics, expanding the content of educational material, disclosing the connections of basic and additional education, etc.) and justification the expediency of making these changes;
• general characteristics of the educational process: forms, methods and means of teaching, technologies

Content of the topics of the training course

• An abstract description of each section according to the numbering in the educational-thematic plan. The presentation of educational material in a given sequence provides for the specification of all didactic content units.
• Content of the training topic:
• the main issues studied,
• practical and laboratory work, creative
  and practical assignments, excursions and other forms of classes used in training,
• requirements for the knowledge and skills of students,
• forms and issues of control,
• possible types of independent work of students.
• Topic name.
• The required number of hours to study it.

Academic-thematic plan

• reflects the sequence of studying sections and topics of the program shows distribution of teaching hours by sections and topics;
• determines the conduct tests, tests, practical and other types of work at the expense of the time provided for the maximum training load;
• compiled for the entire period of study (usually for an academic year);
• drawn up in the form of a table

Requirements for the level of training of students

• Description of the goals-learning outcomes, expressed in the actions of students (operational) and really recognizable with the help of any tool (diagnostic).
• This list of learning outcomes includes specific subject and general learning skills and methods of activity.
• The basis for identifying the requirements for the level of training of students is the state educational standard of general education and the curriculum (exemplary or author's), on the basis of which the work program is developed. Therefore, the requirements for the level of training of students, prescribed in the Work Program, must not be lower than the requirements formulated in the federal component of the state standard for general education and the curriculum adopted as a basis.

Features of the formulation of requirements for the level of training of students

They have to :

• described through the actions of students;
• designate a certain level of achievement;
• be achievable and measurable;
• be described in a language understandable to students.

Educational-methodical teaching aids

include

• basic and additional educational literature (textbooks, teaching aids, collections of exercises and tasks, control tasks, tests, practical work and laboratory workshops, anthology);
• reference manuals (dictionaries, reference books);
• visual material (albums, atlases, maps, tables);
• equipment and instruments ...

Three groups:

• "Literature (basic and additional)";
• "Didactic material";
• "Equipment and devices".

Literature is drawn up in accordance with GOST bibliographic description

Possible options for the use and design of work programs by the teacher

• Using the sample program, the modified example program;
• Using the existing author's program (as a rule, the program of the author of the textbook);
• Using the author's program with the changes made;
• Author's program of the teacher.

Work program approval path

1.Considered on the methodological association, is adopted at the scientific and methodological council. The decision of the SHMO and the NMS is documented in a protocol Preliminary external expertise is possible (June)

2. The school principal issues an order on the approval of each training program. Each program must have a mark about program acceptance (MC), the results of the examination (if any), the school director's mark on the approval of the program (date and number of the order). All programs are approved by August 31st.

3. One copy of the curriculum are part of the PLO and are with the administration in accordancewith a nomenclature of cases. The second copy from the teacher

• Federal List of Extremist Materials (as of 02.04.2019) Open
• Federal Law No. 114 "On Countering Extremist Activities" Open
• Federal Law No. 112-FZ of July 05, 2002 “On Amendments and Additions to Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation in Connection with the Adoption of the Federal Law“ On Countering Extremist Activity ”Open
• Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of March 23, 1995 No. 310 (as amended on November 3, 2004) "On measures to ensure coordinated actions of state authorities in the fight against manifestations of fascism and other forms of political extremism in the Russian Federation"

MBOU Dolgokychinskaya secondary school

Working programm

academic subjects

(FGOS LLC)

from left: Zarubina N.R.

Deputy OIA Director

Work program of academic subjects

Normative - legal and documentary basis

• Federal State Educational Standard LLC
• Approximate basic educational program of LLC
• The fundamental core of the content of general education

Training program - it is a normative document that outlines the range of basic knowledge, skills and abilities to be mastered in each separate academic subject. It includes a list of topics of the studied material, recommendations on the amount of time for each topic, their distribution by years of study and the time allotted for studying the entire course.

Work programs (modified) are programs developed personally as a teacher based on training, but making changes and additions to the content of the academic discipline, the sequence of studying topics, the number of hours, the use of organizational forms of training, and others.

• The work program for the subject is developed by the teacher based on:

• requirements for the results of mastering the basic educational program of basic general education (personal, metasubject, subject); sample programs of basic general education; programs for the formation of universal educational actions; copyright programs.
• requirements for the results of mastering the basic educational program of basic general education (personal, metasubject, subject);
• sample programs of basic general education;
• programs for the formation of universal educational actions;
• copyright programs.
• According to paragraphs 6 and 7 of Art. 32 of the Law of the Russian Federation "On Education in the Russian Federation", the approval of work programs for academic subjects is within the competence of an educational institution.

Rights of an educational institution

• In accordance with the Law of the Russian Federation "On Education in the Russian Federation" (Article 32 "Competence and Responsibility of an Educational Institution" (clause 6.7), an educational institution develops and approves educational programs, including curricula, work programs of training courses, as well as a list of used textbooks and teaching and education tools.
• The compiler of the work program can independently:

• to disclose the content of the sections, topics indicated in the state educational standard, relying on scientific schools and teaching aids (from the federal list) that he considers appropriate; establish the sequence of studying the educational material; distribute the time allotted for the study of the course between sections and topics according to their importance; develop a list of practical lessons; specify the requirements for the knowledge and skills of students; include material of regional content in the amount of teaching hours allocated for this subject; choose, based on the tasks facing the subject, teaching technology and monitoring the preparedness of students in the subject.
• disclose the content of the sections, topics indicated in the state educational standard, relying on scientific schools and teaching aids (from the federal list) that he considers appropriate;
• establish the sequence of studying the educational material;
• distribute the time allotted for the study of the course between sections and topics according to their importance;
• develop a list of practical lessons;
• specify the requirements for the knowledge and skills of students;
• include material of regional content in the amount of teaching hours allocated for this subject;
• choose, based on the tasks facing the subject, teaching technology and monitoring the preparedness of students in the subject.

Work program structure

• The work program for the subject has the following structure:

1. title page:

• the name of the educational institution in accordance with the Charter;
• the name of the subject for the study of which the program was written;
• an indication of the class in which the program is studied;
• surname, name and patronymic of the program developer;
• stamp of consideration, agreement and approval of the program;
• the name of the village in which the program was prepared;
• year of compilation of the program.

2.explanatory note:

• with a list of regulatory documents;
• the general goals and objectives of basic general education are concretized, taking into account the specifics of the academic subject, course;
• general characteristics of the subject, course;
• description of the place of the subject, course in the curriculum;
• the exact name of the author's curriculum for the subject;
• description of the value orientations of the content of the academic subject;
• personal, meta-subject, subject results of mastering a specific academic subject, course.

4. practical training (if any);

5. teaching materials on the subject;

6. calendar-thematic planning with the definition of the main types of educational activities of students and a description of the planned results of mastering the topic.

7.requirements for the level of training of students;

8. characteristics of control and measuring materials;

Justifying the choice of the number of hours by years of study and sections (topics), it is necessary to reveal the sequence of studying the sections and topics of the program, to show the distribution of training hours by sections and topics based on the maximum study load. When describing the content of the topics of the curriculum, the following sequence of presentation is established:

• title of the section (topic);
• content of the educational section (topic);
• the required number of hours to study the section (topic).

It is recommended to draw up the content of the subject according to the following scheme:

№ p / p

Topic name

section

Number of hours

study section

The planned subject results of mastering the educational program are presented taking into account the specifics of the content of subject areas ("The graduate will learn", "The graduate will have the opportunity to learn").

In the section of the software and methodological support of the educational process, the characteristics of the teaching materials are given. The list of educational and methodological support of the work program should include the following materials:

• educational and theoretical (program, textbook);
• methodological and didactic (methodological manual for teachers, collections of tests and tests, notebooks for independent work ...)

EDUCATIONAL-METHODOLOGICAL COMPLEX (EMC)

TEXTBOOK (annually approved by the federal list of textbooks)

Workbooks

Directories

Collections of tasks and exercises, tests, exams

Computer programs and databases

Teaching aids for teachers

• Collections of problems and exercises
• Collections of control and test works
• Directories
• Dictionaries
• Computer programs
• Albums of reproductions, illustrations, etc.

• selection of illustrative material;
• cards for individual and group work;
• presentations

THEMATIC

• Slices
• Counter. work
• Test work

TOTAL

• Counter. work
• Test work

The section "Practical lessons" indicates the number of practical lessons required for the program, laboratory work, distributed by topic. This section is developed for subjects of the natural science cycle (physics, chemistry, biology, geography, informatics)

Control of the level of training contains a package of CMM (control, practical work, tests on topics)

• Planning the control and assessment of students' knowledge is presented in a summary table (by years of study) with the obligatory indication of the form of control, the content of control, the number of works, sources for the periods of study. Sources of control and measuring materials are entered in the table:

• All CMMs presented in the work program must comply with the requirements of FGOS LLC or FC GOS. CMMs, compiled by the developer of the program, should be given in the appendix.

№ lesson

Control type

Theme

Literature

The calendar-thematic plan should contain the following mandatory elements: lesson number p / p, section, lesson topic, FSES (course content and planned results) or FC SES, the main types of educational activities of students or characteristics of students' activities, before each studied section, the goals of the UUD are indicated , practical part, notes.

• Arrange calendar-thematic planning subject is recommended according to the following scheme:

№ p / p

Name of the topic being studied

Lesson topic

Main content on the topic

Number of hours

Characteristics of the main

Content element

Universal Learning Activities

activities (at the level

training activities)

• Recommendations for the design of the work program

• The text of the work program should be printed on one side of an A4 sheet (font Times New Roman, size 12, 1.0 spacing, alignment - in width. Margin sizes: left - 3 cm, right - 1.5 cm, top - 1.5 cm, bottom - 1.5 cm).
• The page number is in the lower right corner without a dot.
• The title page is included in the general page numbering - the page number is not indicated. Headings are printed in capital letters in the middle of the line without a period at the end, in bold, not underlined. Each new element of the program (explanatory note, list of sections (topics) of the program, content of educational material, list of references) is printed on a new page.

Consideration and approval of the work program

• The work program on the subject is considered at a meeting of school methodological associations (the date, the number of the minutes of the meeting of the Ministry of Education and the signature of the head of the Ministry of Defense are indicated), is coordinated with the ZSUVM and approved by the director of the educational institution by August 30

Duration of the work program

• The work program is in effect while the FGOS LLC on the subject is in effect.

© Kuedinsky RMC, 2011

Dear teachers!

It's hard to teach children today

"The cow gives milk."

Century XXI - century of discoveries,

A century of innovation, novelty,

But it depends on the teacher

What kind of children should be.

We wish you children in your class

Shone with smiles and love

I wish you health and creative success

Belgorod Institute for Educational Development

Work programs

on academic subjects:

content, structure, requirements

(article)

Belyaeva Elena Anatolyevna,

primary school teacher

MBOU "Borisovskaya average

comprehensive school number 1

them. A.M. Rudoy "

borisovka, Belgorod region

Belgorod 2013

In connection with the introduction of federal state educational standards of a new generation, the priority direction of the development of general education is to ensure the quality of education that meets the actual needs of the individual, society, and the state.
In accordance with the Federal Law "On Education" and the Federal State Educational Standard, approximate basic educational programs of primary and basic general education have been developed and published, which define the goals, objectives, planned results, content and organization of the educational process.

The approximate curriculum in the academic subject guides the teacher in drawing up work programs.

The work program of a subject is a set of educational and methodological documentation that is independently developed by the teacher (teachers) of the educational institution on the basis of the working curriculum and sample programs of training courses, subjects, disciplines recommended by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation, taking into account the goals and objectives of the main educational program school education and reflecting ways of implementing the content of the subject. It is a teacher's program of action to achieve educational results.

Work program is a normative document that determines the volume, order, content of studying and teaching any academic discipline, based on an exemplary program for the academic subject.

The purpose of the work program is planning, organizing and managing the educational process in a specific academic discipline.

The objectives of the curriculum are the specific definition of the content, volume, and order of study of the academic discipline, taking into account the peculiarities of the educational process of a particular educational institution and the contingent of students.

Each subject teacher should have a work program for their subject. Work programs should reflect the peculiarities of the structure and content of the set of textbooks in the subject chosen by the teacher and in which the teaching is carried out.

Often teachers ask if they can use ready-made, published work programs or should they develop them themselves? If the published work programs meet the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard, there is no need to duplicate them, and ready-made work programs can be used.

Of course, a teacher can independently develop a work program for the set according to which he works, observing all the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard of General Education, taking into account the characteristics of the class in which he works, and present the work program as an individual creative document.

Starting to draw up a work program for a subject, a teacher needs to know well:

the main content of the course, that is, the corresponding section of the fundamental core of the content of general education, which is preserved regardless of which textbook the teacher is working on;

requirements for the results of mastering the basic educational program of the corresponding level of education in the field of their academic subject;

planned results of studying a subject;

a program for the formation of universal educational actions;

a program for the education and socialization of students.

A teacher can familiarize himself with all these materials by reading a sample curriculum in his academic subject and an approximate basic educational program of the corresponding level of education.

It should be recalled that the work program is not drawn up in general for the academic subject, but for a specific line of textbooks according to which the teacher works.

Requirements for the program:

1. The presence of signs of a regulatory document.

2. Taking into account the main provisions of the educational program of the school.

3. Completeness of disclosure of values \u200b\u200band learning goals.

4. The consistency and integrity of the content of education.

5. The sequence of the location and the relationship of all elements of the course content; determination of methods, organizational forms and means of teaching, which reflects the unity of the content of education and the learning process in building the program.

6. Taking into account the logical relationships with other subjects of the educational plan of the educational institution.

7. Concrete and unambiguous presentation of elements of the content of education.

Work programs are created taking into account:

. requirements for components of federal state educational standards;

. mandatory minimum content of basic educational programs;

. the volume of educational material for students;

. requirements for the level of training of graduates;

. the amount of hours of study load determined by the school curriculum for the implementation of academic subjects in each class (parallels);

. cognitive characteristics and cognitive interests of students;

. goals and objectives of the educational program of the institution;

. used set of educational and methodological support;

. information and technical equipment of the classroom (educational process)

Structure

The work program for any academic subject should follow the same structure as the sample program. This structure is defined by the Federal State Educational Standard.

The work program should include:

1. Title page.

2. Explanatory note.

3. General characteristics of the subject.

4. Description of the place of the subject in the school curriculum.

5. Personal, metasubject, subject results of mastering a subject.

6. Content of the subject.

7. Thematic planning of the training course.

8. Planned results of achievement by students.

9. Description of educational-methodical and material-technical support of the educational process.

I will give specific methodological recommendations for drawing up work programs of academic subjects in accordance with the requirements of the Federal State Educational Standard and their mandatory structural components.

1. Title page work program should contain:

The name of the educational institution;

The name of the course for which the program was written;

The level of the program (basic, profile level, in-depth or extended study of the subject);

Indicating the parallel, the class in which the course is studied;

Surname, name, patronymic of the teacher - the compiler of the work program;

Program approval stamp;

The year the program was drawn up.

2. Explanatory note the work program for the academic subject should contain:

the normative basis of the program (the federal component of the state educational standard (hereinafter FSES), an approximate program in a general education subject, an author's educational program in accordance with the educational and methodological package, an educational program of an educational institution, an educational program in a subject, a curriculum of an educational institution;

the goals and objectives of teaching in a given class;

distinctive features in comparison with the exemplary program (changing the number of hours for studying individual topics, rearranging the order of studying topics, expanding the content of educational material, etc.), justification of the additions and changes made;

the number of teaching hours for which the work program is designed, including the number of hours for conducting control (indicating the type), laboratory, practical work, excursions, projects, research, speech development lessons;

intersubject (metasubject) connections of the academic subject;

taking into account the characteristics of students in the class;

features of the organization of the educational process in the subject: forms, methods, teaching aids used by the teacher;

types of control (introductory, current, thematic, milestone, final, complex); - forms of control used by the teacher;

used educational and methodological kit (complete list).

3. General characteristics of the subject (this section describes the features of the content and methodological apparatus of textbooks, including how the fundamental core of the content of general education is reflected in the selected educational and methodological set);

4. Description of the place of the subject in the curriculum educational institution should reflect information about which part of the curriculum (mandatory or optional) and why this subject belongs to this or that part, how it should be implemented in terms of the number of hours per week by grade and the total number of hours. The description of the place of the academic subject in the program should reflect information from the curriculum of a specific educational institution, and not the basic one.

5. Personal, metasubject, subject results of mastering a subject which must be taken from the Federal State Educational Standard and can be supplemented in accordance with the characteristics of the selected textbooks;

6. Description of the value guidelines of the content of the academic subject should contain the value orientations of a specific academic subject, taken from the exemplary program and program of spiritual and moral development and education of primary schoolchildren of the basic educational program of an educational institution, and correlated with the content of a specific academic subject.

7. Calendar-thematic planning is one of the most important components of the work program, because allows you to distribute all educational material in accordance with the curriculum and the annual work schedule of the general education institution.

Calendar-thematic planning is developed for the academic year. The calendar-thematic plan should contain information about the sections and topics of the program, indicating the amount of study hours allocated for their implementation; topics of lessons within the framework of passing the topics and sections of the program, topics of workshops and laboratory lessons; topics of lessons of control of the results of assimilation of program material by students. Lesson distribution of educational material is carried out sequentially. The approximate timeframe for completing training topics is indicated according to the calendar of the current year.

In each reporting period (quarter, semester, half-year), the calendar-thematic plan of the work program must be correlated with the class journal and the teacher's report on the passage of the program material. In case of discrepancy, the teacher justifies and makes changes to the calendar-thematic plan, providing conditions for completing the program in full in less or more teaching hours.

The approximate form of the calendar-thematic plan.

Lesson numbers	Names of sections and topics	Scheduled timing	Adjusted transit times
The title of the studied topic number 1 (total hours for its study; the number of hours per week according to the curriculum)
	Lesson topic
	Lesson topic
	Control lesson topic
	Total	** hours

8. The planned results of students achieving the requirements for the results of mastering the basic educational program (the teacher can take this section from the approximate basic educational program of the educational institution).

Requirements for the level of training students are a description of the goals-learning outcomes, expressed in the actions of students and really recognizable with the help of any tool (diagnostic). This list of learning outcomes includes specific subject and general learning skills and methods of activity. The basis for identifying the requirements for the level of training of students is the state educational standard of general education and the curriculum (exemplary or author's), on the basis of which the work program is developed. Therefore, the requirements for the level of training of students prescribed in the Work Program must not be lower than the requirements formulated in the federal component of the state standard of general education and the curriculum adopted as a basis.

When developing requirements for the level of training of students, it is necessary to take into account the peculiarities of their formulation. Namely, they should: be described through the actions of students; designate a certain level of achievement; be achievable and measurable; be described in a language understandable to students.

This section should contain:

a package of control and measuring materials indicating the number of the lesson, the date of the (control work, tests by class and topic, input and final work).

criteria and norms for assessing knowledge, abilities and skills of students (oral answers, control and independent work, test tasks, etc.).

9. Description of logistics educational process should also be presented in the table. When describing it, it is necessary to take into account the real conditions of the educational process of a particular educational institution. For example, if an educational institution has computer classes, then their use is planned in the work program of the subject, if physical education is planned to teach students to swim, then the presence of a pool should be indicated, etc. Electronic resources should be specifically listed, and not only indicate their availability on a specific site on the Internet. In the column "quantity" it is necessary to indicate the actual number of objects used in the educational process of a particular educational institution. Tables and chairs do not relate to the material and technical support of the educational process according to the work program of the subject.

List of educational and methodological support , which is a component of the work program, contains reference information on the output of exemplary and copyright programs, the author's educational and methodological kit and additional literature, and also includes data on the educational and laboratory equipment used.

It should be noted that the Law of the Russian Federation "On Education" does not define the requirements for the work program. Each teacher chooses an independent form of records, a text version of the work program. One of the options for the work program can be drawn up by analogy with the requirements for a typical curriculum. The teacher can make adjustments to all structural elements of the program, taking into account the characteristics of his educational institution and the characteristics of students in a particular class. For example, to determine a new order of study of the material, change the number of hours, make changes to the content of the studied topic, supplement the requirements for the level of training of students. This will allow you to see the features of the content implemented by the teacher, but does not contain information about the features of the organization of the educational process. However, in order to avoid discrepancies at the level of an educational institution, it is necessary to develop uniform approaches to the development and execution of work programs for teachers, securing them with the Regulation on the work program of a teacher.

The procedure for the development and approval of the work program

The work program is subject to examination .

The work program is developed by each teacher independently for one academic year on the basis of an approximate or author's program in the subject in accordance with the educational program of the institution. The number of teaching hours in a subject in the work program must correspond to the annual number of teaching hours in the school's curriculum for the current academic year. If the number of hours does not match, it is necessary to justify the changes in the explanatory note. When making changes to the subject matter, the sequence of studying the material, the number, duration of tests, etc. it is necessary to provide justification for the changes in the explanatory note.

The teacher submits the work program to the meeting of the methodological association of subject teachers for the examination of compliance with the established requirements. The minutes of the meeting of the methodological association of subject teachers indicate the fact that the work program meets the established requirements.

Then the work program is analyzed by the deputy director for teaching and educational work for compliance with the curriculum of the educational institution and the requirements of state educational standards, and the presence of the textbook intended for use is checked in the federal list.

After approval, the work program is approved by the director of the educational institution, puts the stamp of approval on the title page (top right): APPROVED Director (signature) Signature transcript. Date.

General requirements for the design of the work program

The text is typed in Word for Windows in Times New Roman font, size 12-14, single line spacing, no hyphenation in the text, justified alignment, paragraph 1.25 cm, margins on all sides 2 cm; centering of headings and paragraphs in the text are performed using Word tools, A4 sheets. Tables are inserted directly into the text. The curriculum is stitched, the pages are numbered, sealed with the seal of the educational institution and the signature of the head of the educational institution.

The title page is counted first, but not numbered, as well as the pages of the appendix.

Calendar-thematic planning is presented in the form of a table.

The list of references is built in alphabetical order, indicating the city and name of the publisher, year of issue, the number of pages of the document (book), if it has been fully studied. It is allowed to draw up a list of literature on the main sections of the subject being studied.